MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory18 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190628
Uptime4 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '23 at 17:50
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 91%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 68
1-Core 140
2-Core 282
86% 164 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 1014
95% 788 Pts
64-Core 2130
132% 2130 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 176
Parallax 164
147% 174 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 139
Splatting 121
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
766GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 181 192 195 196 199 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 240
Write 272
Mixed 302
SusWrite 189
57% 250 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 34
133% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 206
159% 218 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 114%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
438GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 183 194 201 200 199 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 371
Write 359
Mixed 301
SusWrite 192
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 44.4
141% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 213
162% 219 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 111%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
475GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 129 132 130 132 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 175
Write 124
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 131
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 0.7
11% 4.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 1
2% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 23%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 161 167 166 167 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 178
Write 166
Mixed 99.8
SusWrite 165
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 0.7
12% 4.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 1.1
2% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 23%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
157GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 60 62 61 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 94
Write 91.2
Mixed 55
SusWrite 61.4
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.3% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 26.1
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 24.3
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $956
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback