| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 166% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131106 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 18 '23 at 00:17 |
| Run Duration | 153 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 41% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.6%
Good
|
57% 92.7 Pts
|
36% 294 Pts
|
22% 350 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
Palit(1569 2216) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
166%
Outstanding
|
178% 250 fps
|
190% 241 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 119 66 39 35 35 MB/s
|
67.7%
Good
|
58% 260 MB/s
|
125% 41.8 MB/s
|
140% 204 MB/s
|
|
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB
74GB free
Firmware: MAV01H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 252 261 236 217 206 MB/s
|
92.9%
Outstanding
|
83% 367 MB/s
|
160% 53.6 MB/s
|
197% 263 MB/s
|
|
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
127GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 175 243 266 215 48 MB/s
|
63.3%
Good
|
64% 285 MB/s
|
101% 37.2 MB/s
|
64% 124 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 F3-14900CL8-4GBXM F3-14900CL8-4GBXM 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.8%
Poor
|
26% 9.07 GB/s
|
27% 9.4 GB/s
|
51% 78 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 564x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 138x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 80x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 67x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 62x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 59x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $610 |