Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '23 at 19:46
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$181
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 151
2-Core 272
96% 172 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 543
63% 489 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 85%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 184
Parallax 115
96% 139 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 100
Splatting 96.2
90% 112 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ256GDNU A 256GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYLA1102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 194 263 206 210 219 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 304
Write 425
Mixed 400
SusWrite 217
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 37.8
123% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 166
163% 260 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 99%
WDC WDS960G2G0C-00AJM0 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: 231800WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1173 215 214 260 298 274 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,246
Write 1,220
Mixed 881
SusWrite 406
210% 938 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 58.4
192% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 577
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 192
180% 292 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 150%
Great: 245%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
133GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 62 63 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 48.1
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 61.8
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105
517GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 95 91 94 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 89.4
Write 82.2
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 91.9
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Thermaltake Co Ltd R009D408GX2-4400C19A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 4403 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 50
MC Write 56.2
MC Mixed 48.2
147% 51.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 49.3
SC Mixed 33.5
101% 35.2 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 137%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 11,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $738
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback