Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 17:36
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 106
53% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 349
35% 284 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 51% Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solid 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 211 258 344 361 355 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 400
Write 337
Mixed 268
SusWrite 290
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 17.5
89% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 70.3
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 27.3
55% 105 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 79%
Hitachi HDS721064CLA332 640GB
141GB free
Firmware: JPGOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 63 67 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 111
Write 116
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 63.7
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
481GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 126 127 125 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 70
Write 28.5
Mixed 66
SusWrite 125
54% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.8
126% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69
564GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 96 94 96 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 96.9
Write 101
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 94.7
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
516GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 180 180 181 182 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 139
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 177
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 112%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 105 104 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 104
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HUS722T1TALA600 1TB
821GB free
Firmware: RADEMU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 61 63 67 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 138
Write 126
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 63.7
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
314% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 111%
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 578e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 138 143 148 147 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 176
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 140
193% 148 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 1
452% 8.77 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 11.6
DQ Mixed 1.1
435% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 88%
Seagate OneTouch HDD 2TB
1.5TB free, PID ab50
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 101 109 115 116 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 76.5
Write 123
Mixed 77
SusWrite 107
136% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.9
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX Builds (Compare 426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $527
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback