Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 22:52
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 52%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 165
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 277
34% 257 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 88.4
54% 72 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 74.6
Splatting 47.2
49% 61.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 298
Write 166
Mixed 164
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 16.5
48% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 110
92% 133 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
463GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 380 418 432 469 466 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 435
Mixed 339
SusWrite 418
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 44.7
131% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 366
276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
WD WD102KRYZ-01A5AB0 10TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 242 244 239 244 254 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 228
Write 240
Mixed 113
SusWrite 244
151% 206 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1.9
400% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 136%
Great: 136%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
28GB free, PID null, Sandisk Cruzer 64gb
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26.3
Write 13.7
Mixed 16.2
22% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.1
220% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,037 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback