Today's hottest deals

Intel X99H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel X99
MotherboardIntel X99H  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '23 at 02:30
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 144
58% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 427
41% 340 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.2
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.7% Below average
Lighting 46.7
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 70.2
38% 58.8 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 55.9
Splatting 44.6
43% 53.5 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 512GB SSD 512GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3130A2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 383 395 189 48 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 383
Write 190
Mixed 286
SusWrite 246
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 11.9
112% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 14.9
68% 147 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown atermiter 1x16GB
1 of 24 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.9% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.8
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback