Today's hottest deals

Medion invalid

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion invalid  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-EM2
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '23 at 13:22
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$37
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
22.8% Poor
Memory 5.29
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 140
34% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 234
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Elitegroup(1019 9BC9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4542
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.91% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 5.2
5% 4.17 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 9.6
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.91%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NS100 512GB
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.1.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 254 320 282 259 264 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 313
Write 316
Mixed 310
SusWrite 277
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 14.6
51% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 165
124% 166 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G44BB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 4.4
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 3.2
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 450
9% 450 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical invalid Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Medion invalid

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $176
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback