Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics39.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '23 at 18:01
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: 12th Gen Intel Core i5-12500H
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 42.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 182
65% 120 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 304
33% 262 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
HP(103C 8A27) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.3% Below average
Lighting 48.2
Reflection 49.9
Parallax 46.2
39% 48.1 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 45.6
Splatting 41.7
39% 49.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 258GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 411 516 590 629 641 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 318
Write 303
Mixed 304
SusWrite 534
83% 365 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 15.2
57% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 421
280% 338 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 23.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback