HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8054
Memory19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '23 at 23:19
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$163
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 71.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 210
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 513
56% 442 Pts
64-Core 545
34% 545 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8054) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.2 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.4
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G 256GB
230GB free
Firmware: 20140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 0.6 4.8 4.5 4.5 4.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
385% Outstanding
Read 4,749
Write 45.1
Mixed 89
SusWrite 3.7
254% 1,222 MB/s
4K Read 481
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 5.1
737% 163 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 385%
Great: 171%
KingFast 256GB
172GB free
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 0.6 4.6 4.4 4.5 4.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 139%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
759GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 21 48 34 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 412
Write 379
Mixed 328
SusWrite 31.4
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 35
115% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 285
232% 328 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 125%
WD WD20EFZX-68AWUN0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 81.00B81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 0.5 4.7 4.3 4.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 115%
Seagate ST8000NM0105 8TB
81GB free
Firmware: G00A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 0.5 4.7 4.4 4.5 4.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 132%
Seagate ST8000NM0105 8TB
80GB free
Firmware: G00A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 22 4.8 4.4 4.5 4.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 132%
Seagate ST8000NM0105 8TB
160GB free
Firmware: G00A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 11 4.8 4.4 4.5 4.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 132%
Seagate ST8000NM0105 8TB
160GB free
Firmware: G00A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 0.6 4.7 4.4 4.5 4.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 132%
Sabrent Disk Device 12TB
194GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 0.6 4.4 4.2 4.1 4.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 20% Great: 79%
Sabrent Disk Device 14TB
66GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 4.9 28 18 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 203
Write 207
Mixed 135
SusWrite 21.5
180% 142 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 3
274% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x4589] GKE800UD102408-2666 Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF - [0x4589] GKE800UD102408-2666 Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.4% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 19.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 17.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 3,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback