Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive318% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '23 at 16:57
Run Duration528 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 80.3
1-Core 170
2-Core 337
104% 196 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 952
97% 787 Pts
64-Core 1,097
68% 1,097 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.7% Average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 58.3
Parallax 79.9
50% 66.3 fps
MRender 58
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 43.2
44% 55.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1739 2323 2330 2372 2318 1140 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,384
Write 2,386
Mixed 2,209
SusWrite 2037
508% 2,254 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 72.6
234% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 799
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 610
440% 580 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 318%
Great: 410%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
4.5TB free
Firmware: 9128
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 109%
WD WD140EFGX-68B0GN0 14TB
7TB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 128 117 111 112 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 58.9
Write 161
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 119
65% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 51%
Great: 118%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
1TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 164 162 168 166 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 155
Write 160
Mixed 171
SusWrite 164
225% 162 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 1.5
351% 6.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 107%
Sabrent Disk Device 16TB
12.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 47 46 47 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 239
Write 209
Mixed 155
SusWrite 47.2
205% 162 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 1.1
667% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 2
DQ Write 4.2
DQ Mixed 1
184% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 123%
Sabrent Disk Device 8TB
152GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 55 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 66.2
Write 79.9
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 56.2
97% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
45% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 74%
External USB3.0 DISK04 12TB
127GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 89 105 106 105 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 107
Write 100
Mixed 154
SusWrite 102
161% 116 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 1.1
490% 9.77 MB/s
DQ Read 1.7
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 1.4
496% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 108%
Sabrent Disk Device 8TB
679GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 55 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 122
Write 144
Mixed 106
SusWrite 56.2
143% 107 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
214% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 74%
Sabrent Disk Device 8TB
67GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 55 56 56 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 216
Write 194
Mixed 144
SusWrite 56.7
194% 153 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.2
288% 9.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 74%
Sabrent Disk Device 14TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 56 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 164
Write 167
Mixed 121
SusWrite 55.9
165% 127 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.5
283% 5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 94%
External USB3.0 DISK01 14TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 89 105 106 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 204
Mixed 196
SusWrite 103
236% 177 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 1
647% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 3.9
DQ Write 8.2
DQ Mixed 0.4
307% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 105%
Great: 111%
External USB3.0 DISK02 12TB
22GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 89 105 106 105 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 188
Write 186
Mixed 209
SusWrite 102
231% 171 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.3
309% 10 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 71%
Sabrent Disk Device 14TB
7TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 47 46 47 46 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 232
Write 209
Mixed 154
SusWrite 46.4
203% 161 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.7
330% 10.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 94%
Sabrent Disk Device 12TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 47 47 46 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.3% Very good
Read 234
Write 212
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 46.4
180% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 1.4
439% 4.87 MB/s
DQ Read 1.6
DQ Write 6.5
DQ Mixed 1.2
268% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 79%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
1TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 175 176 177 177 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 138
Write 143
Mixed 150
SusWrite 176
212% 152 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 1.3
365% 6.67 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 8.7
DQ Mixed 1.6
354% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 103%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 50
Write 38.5
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 20.6
45% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 1.1
260% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 103%
Sabrent Disk Device 16TB
6TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 47 47 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 234
Write 221
Mixed 126
SusWrite 46.4
197% 157 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 0.5
513% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 4
DQ Write 6.1
DQ Mixed 1.4
270% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 123%
External USB3.0 DISK00 8TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 167 171 169 172 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 205
Write 183
Mixed 204
SusWrite 168
257% 190 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.4
326% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 89%
Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK03 12TB
411GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 167 171 169 172 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 183
Mixed 114
SusWrite 168
217% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 1.4
437% 4.67 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 8.5
DQ Mixed 1.3
338% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$32
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 30
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 25.6
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 24.2
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $991
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $377WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback