Today's hottest deals

Intel X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '23 at 21:55
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 56.8
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 158
55% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 366
40% 319 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
CLim: 1489 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 19.4
Parallax 18.7
16% 19.4 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 17.5
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$71
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 956 941 938 955 950 957 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 947
Write 922
Mixed 953
SusWrite 949
213% 943 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 40.1
131% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 509
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 450
323% 421 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 155%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB1-CRC 2x31.5GB
2 of 24 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 16
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $131
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback