Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Studio XPS 8100

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	26GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 26GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago.

System	Dell Studio XPS 8100
Motherboard	Dell Studio XPS 8100 (all builds)
Memory	22.8 GB free of 26 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100708
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '23 at 12:07
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 86.4 1-Core 69.4 2-Core 152 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 326 36% 282 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% MSI(1462 3413) CLim: 1279 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Lighting 65.8 Reflection 58.9 Parallax 86.2 54% 70.3 fps	MRender 62.2 Gravity 73.9 Splatting 44 48% 60 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingchuxing 1TB 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 889GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0609B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 212 218 221 227 223 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.4% Above average	Read 250 Write 226 Mixed 233 SusWrite 218 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 20.8 84% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 44 61% 111 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 181%
Generic- SD/MMC 8GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 7GB free, PID 9106 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.1 6.3 6.3 3.2 3.1 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 56.1 Write 7.7 Mixed 7 SusWrite 5.2 17% 19 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 55% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 13%
Generic- MS/MS-Pro 0GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 1% 0GB free, PID 9106 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.2 1.1 1.1 3.3 3.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 100 Write 5.2 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 1.8 22% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Mixed 0 178% 16 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 3%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HMT351U6EFR8A-PB Kingston KP223C-ELD 26GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.9% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 11 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Studio XPS 8100 Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Studio XPS 8100

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $290Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	275x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	202x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	116x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	50x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	34x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	32x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG 4x2GBNanyaBench 41%, 938 samples	42x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,488 samples	31x
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GBElpidaBench 40%, 1,380 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $434

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248	Nvidia RTX 4070 $493	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350