Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime18.9 Days
Run DateSep 25 '20 at 21:35
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 71.6
1-Core 147
2-Core 292
90% 170 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 827
88% 702 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 863E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.2% Poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 22.5
20% 24.7 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 24
Splatting 31.3
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA73H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,945
Write 292
Mixed 351
184% 863 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 62.2
234% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,170
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 535
454% 686 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 306%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
46GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 106 122 82 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 122
Write 108
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 108
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
230% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 94 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 92.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 93.4
61% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 63%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
300GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 80 79 80 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 86.5
Write 78
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 79.7
100% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
164% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 63%
Generic- MS/MS-Pro 0GB
0GB free, PID 9106
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1 1 1 1 1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.79% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 1
Mixed 1.2
SusWrite 1
2% 1.17 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
11% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.79%
Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 24.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $736
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $118
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback