Today's hottest deals

Lenovo ChiefRiver Platform

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo ChiefRiver Platform  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Emerald Lake 2
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '23 at 20:44
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B960
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 59
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 58.5
36% 53.7 Pts
4-Core 65.2
8-Core 62.2
9% 63.7 Pts
64-Core 58.3
4% 58.3 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0226A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 23 29 14 5.1 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 380
Write 297
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 46.6
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 1.5
42% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 0.4
32% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 81%
SDHC Card 32GB
23GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.1
Write 21.8
Mixed 20.9
29% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.8
120% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 6 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 4.5
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ChiefRiver Platform Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo ChiefRiver Platform

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback