bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory55GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 55GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory51.1 GB free of 55 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '23 at 03:45
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 74F3 24-Core
None, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 148
2-Core 265
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 511
61% 473 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A10-4Q
Nvidia(10DE 14BB) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.89
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.8% Poor
Lighting 27.3
Reflection 28
Parallax 30.6
22% 28.6 fps
MRender 31
Gravity 28
Splatting 19.8
21% 26.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 193GB
172GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 248
Write 250
Mixed 249
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 41
132% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 81.6
DQ Write 81.7
DQ Mixed 80
61% 81.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 78%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 254
Write 119
Mixed 195
143% 189 MB/s
4K Read 77.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.2
3,612% 27.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 32GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 32767 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
149% Outstanding
MC Read 47.4
MC Write 59.7
MC Mixed 59.8
159% 55.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 58.4
SC Mixed 41.7
119% 41.5 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 149%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback