Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	55GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 55GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC 74F3 24-Core 35 User benchmarks, average bench 78% None, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 76.5 1-Core 148 2-Core 265 89% 163 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 511 61% 473 Pts	64-Core 514 32% 514 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia A10-4Q 8 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Nvidia(10DE 14BB) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.89 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	21.8% Poor	Lighting 27.3 Reflection 28 Parallax 30.6 22% 28.6 fps	MRender 31 Gravity 28 Splatting 19.8 21% 26.3 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 193GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 172GB free Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 248 Write 250 Mixed 249 56% 249 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 41 132% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 81.6 DQ Write 81.7 DQ Mixed 80 61% 81.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 78%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB 403 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 254 Write 119 Mixed 195 143% 189 MB/s	4K Read 77.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 3.2 3,612% 27.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 32GB 232 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 0, 0 MHz 1024, 32767 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	149% Outstanding	MC Read 47.4 MC Write 59.7 MC Mixed 59.8 159% 55.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.5 SC Write 58.4 SC Mixed 41.7 119% 41.5 GB/s	Latency 87.3 46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 148%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	829x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325