Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel N100 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Memory 13.7 1-Core 13.5 2-Core 26.9 11% 18 Pts	4-Core 49 8-Core 76.5 8% 62.8 Pts	64-Core 123 8% 123 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 2,359 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 3B3C) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3677 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	2.77% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 4.2 2% 3.57 fps	MRender 4.8 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 4.4 4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.77% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ128HCHQ-00BL2 128GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 132% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7L2QFXM7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 205 218 151 156 206 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 452 Write 340 Mixed 441 SusWrite 205 81% 359 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 17.1 4K Mixed 21.4 60% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 74.1 DQ Mixed 131 93% 121 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 190%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 4x2GB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.9% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 12.2 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 2.5 6% 2.2 GB/s	Latency 371 11% 371 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	59	60	15.5"	1280 720	LEN9051

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
N100IntelBench 50%, 2,388 samples	15x
Core i3-N305IntelBench 59%, 282 samples	9x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,359 samples	15x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 6%, 622 samples	9x

SSD
MZALQ128HCHQ-00BL2 128GBSamsungBench 132%, 67 samples	10x
MZAL4256HBJD-00BL2 256GBSamsungBench 146%, 356 samples	5x
CL1-4D128 128GBSsstcBench 83%, 486 samples	4x

RAM
MT62F1G32D4DR-031 4x2GBMicronBench 68%, 149 samples	10x
H9JCNNNBK3MLYR-N6E 4x1GBHynixBench 55%, 25 samples	8x
K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 4x2GBSamsungBench 63%, 14 samples	5x