Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics98.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory17.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateAug 16 '23 at 17:58
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 2600 How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 167
58% 104 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 458
44% 364 Pts
64-Core 858
53% 858 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.4% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 110
Parallax 125
96% 118 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 112
Splatting 103
103% 130 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 7.3 9.5 7.5 9.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 632
Write 678
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 10.2
247% 343 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 3.5
788% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 185%
Great: 282%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB
297GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 44 47 45 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 106
Write 48
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 44.8
53% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
181% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 109%
Amd-raid Array 3 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 44 42 49 49 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 149
Write 169
Mixed 114
SusWrite 45.6
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.1
397% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 121%
Amd-raid Array 4 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 47 46 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 114
Write 141
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 44.7
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.7
304% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 97%
Amd-raid Array 5 6TB
705GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 43 44 43 38 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.3% Average
Read 114
Write 105
Mixed 91.9
SusWrite 42.6
66% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.2
243% 2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 33
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 31.3
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.6
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 120 24" 1280 720 AUS24AC VG248
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,033
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback