GPD G1619-04

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive563% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGPD G1619-04  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1619-04
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 17 '23 at 00:42
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 58.7
1-Core 198
2-Core 384
108% 214 Pts
4-Core 687
8-Core 1,076
109% 882 Pts
64-Core 1,306
81% 1,306 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Device(1E50 8018) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.40.62
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.6% Below average
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 24.1
Parallax 61.8
29% 40.6 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 47.2
Splatting 61.2
39% 45.8 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE980Y38900-2TB 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10191
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3759 3746 3734 3893 3914 3907 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
563% Outstanding
Read 4,028
Write 4,619
Mixed 3,422
SusWrite 3,825
897% 3,973 MB/s
4K Read 66.7
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 94.9
325% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,684
DQ Write 1,348
DQ Mixed 1306
1,035% 1,446 MB/s
Poor: 290%
This bench: 563%
Great: 563%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66BK7BX067 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
156% Outstanding
MC Read 49.6
MC Write 70.8
MC Mixed 48.5
161% 56.3 GB/s
SC Read 46.2
SC Write 66.3
SC Mixed 55.7
160% 56.1 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 156%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 10.1" 1280 720 JDI0031 GPD1001H
Typical G1619-04 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: GPD G1619-04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 243% - Outstanding Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback