Today's hottest deals

Eurocom Neptune 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemEurocom Neptune 2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardEUROCOM Neptune 2.0
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '23 at 20:57
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3920XM
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 190
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 446
48% 379 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 4000 (PHDGD IvyDrive 3.0)
Clevo(1558 7102) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 3.1
4% 3.2 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.2
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 71 46 53 40 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 455
Write 107
Mixed 118
SusWrite 54.1
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 19.3
98% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 95.2
DQ Mixed 49.8
77% 153 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 73%
Afox SD250-480GQN 480GB
337GB free
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 32 32 33 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 04EF Team--Elite-1600 04EF Team--Elite-1600 WALRAM 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 60 17.3" 1280 720 LGD0365
Typical Neptune 2.0 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Eurocom Neptune 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $529
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $273WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback