MSI MS-158P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Bravo 15 B7ED
MotherboardMSI MS-158P  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230823
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 24 '23 at 09:41
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 45.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 177
59% 110 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 267
34% 259 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 660M
MSI(1462 13DF) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.03.06
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 7
Parallax 7.6
3% 6.17 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 7.8
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1015
Write 1,535
Mixed 880
257% 1,143 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 21.2
102% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 294
208% 268 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA095N Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 16GB
5600, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 17.7
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.7
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOD0A2
Typical MS-158P Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-158P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback