MSI MS-158N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Bravo 15 C7VF
MotherboardMSI MS-158N  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230320
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 21:38
Run Duration97 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 133
49% 85 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 284
26% 220 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 660M
MSI(1462 13DD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.03.06
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.89% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 3.9
2% 3 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2.4
2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.89%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,742
Write 1,502
Mixed 1,423
346% 1,556 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 36.1
121% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 258
191% 257 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 332%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 22.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 58%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical MS-158N Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI MS-158N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback