Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	45 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230814
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '23 at 05:31
Run Duration	352 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	Memory 83.5 1-Core 138 2-Core 273 90% 165 Pts	4-Core 528 8-Core 1,011 92% 770 Pts	64-Core 2,165 134% 2,165 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Asus(1043 8709) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.6% Above average	Lighting 68.3 Reflection 63.3 Parallax 73.8 56% 68.5 fps	MRender 77.4 Gravity 72 Splatting 49.5 52% 66.3 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100 46,203 User benchmarks, average bench 317% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,338 Write 2,706 Mixed 1,582 424% 1,875 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 141 4K Mixed 57.1 203% 78.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1419 DQ Write 773 DQ Mixed 888 716% 1,026 MB/s
Poor: 189% Great: 486%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 573GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1455 1476 1450 1008 976 978 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	260% Outstanding	Read 1,754 Write 1,580 Mixed 1,248 SusWrite 1,224 326% 1,451 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 58 193% 69.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1400 DQ Write 1,070 DQ Mixed 1205 909% 1,225 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 260% Great: 372%
Seagate ST10000NM0196-2AA131 10TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 1.5TB free Firmware: TA23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 181 183 183 178 179 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 167 Mixed 87.1 SusWrite 180 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.9 262% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 134%
Seagate ST10000NM0196-2AA131 10TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 2.5TB free Firmware: TA23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 201 202 205 198 199 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 178 Mixed 89.6 SusWrite 200 122% 168 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 1.2 345% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 134%
Seagate ST10000NM0196-2AA131 10TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 1.5TB free Firmware: TA23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 175 175 175 171 172 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 182 Mixed 92.8 SusWrite 173 116% 159 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 1.4 359% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 134%
WD WUH721414ALE604 14TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 1.5TB free Firmware: LDAZW110 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 207 205 196 199 205 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 215 Write 224 Mixed 91.1 SusWrite 203 134% 183 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 2.2 364% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 140%
Asmt ASM235CM 8TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 113 115 113 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Read 187 Write 162 Mixed 107 SusWrite 113 105% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 1.3 325% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 93%
Asmt ASM235CM 10TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 152 159 159 154 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 204 Write 200 Mixed 112 SusWrite 156 123% 168 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 1.2 339% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 111%
Asmt ASM235CM 10TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 119 121 117 121 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Read 190 Write 180 Mixed 107 SusWrite 118 110% 149 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.2 324% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 111%
Asmt ASM235CM 14TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 162 168 168 165 169 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 236 Write 240 Mixed 146 SusWrite 166 145% 197 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 2.5 587% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 116%
Asmt ASM235CM 14TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 162 168 169 163 168 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 116%
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 8TB 824 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 20GB free Firmware: PA26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 105 106 104 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 102 Write 101 Mixed 73.9 SusWrite 104 70% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 1 233% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-16GTZNC 4x16GB 3,536 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	105% Outstanding	MC Read 41.4 MC Write 37.4 MC Mixed 37.7 111% 38.8 GB/s	SC Read 24.3 SC Write 24.5 SC Mixed 33.5 78% 27.4 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 133%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	27.9"	1280 720	AUS28B1 ASUS VP28U

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,658x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,274x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,421x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,242x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,078x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,472x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,840x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	727x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,037

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16