Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+ (all builds)
Memory	0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160513
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '23 at 17:54
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	94%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88 21,890 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 92.4 1-Core 43 2-Core 82 50% 72.5 Pts	4-Core 121 8-Core 117 16% 119 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 139D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing below potential (78^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	59.6% Above average	Lighting 77.5 Reflection 74.7 Parallax 72.2 63% 74.8 fps	MRender 60.7 Gravity 74.5 Splatting 59.6 53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 730 Series 240GB-$250 8,417 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: L2010410 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 210 232 215 226 242 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 331 Write 280 Mixed 250 SusWrite 218 60% 269 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 29 111% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 212 163% 223 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 95%
Intenso SSD 2TB 242 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 2TB free Firmware: W0413A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 215 242 218 236 264 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 401 Write 289 Mixed 284 SusWrite 228 67% 300 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 46.7 4K Mixed 18.7 81% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 45 74% 142 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 281%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 116GB free Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 227 259 232 253 283 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	73% Very good	Read 399 Write 322 Mixed 270 SusWrite 242 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 60 4K Mixed 31.2 107% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 161 132% 188 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 466GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 128 128 127 125 128 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 176 Write 131 Mixed 81.3 SusWrite 126 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 114%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 144 144 143 143 151 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Read 162 Write 152 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 142 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 178GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 92 93 94 92 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 115 Write 98 Mixed 55.5 SusWrite 91.9 66% 90 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 70%
WD Elements 1.5TB 5,064 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 583GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 36 34 36 37 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 36.1 Mixed 32.3 SusWrite 34.9 47% 34.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 1x4GB 1,455 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.8% Very poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 0.9 7% 2.47 GB/s	Latency 95.2 42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 36%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	62	44	60	27"	1280 720	PHLC20C PHL 275E1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A88X Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+ - $104

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	11x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	11x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	10x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	9x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	9x
Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	4x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	7x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 3,851 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $385

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16