MSI MS-158P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Bravo 15 B7ED
MotherboardMSI MS-158P  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 17:09
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 70.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 291
91% 172 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 778
82% 657 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 6550M
MSI(1462 13DF) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.14
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 17
Parallax 32.2
10% 20.4 fps
MRender 17.3
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 19.4
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1338 1470 1444 1491 1522 1569 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,351
Write 1,248
Mixed 1,204
SusWrite 1,472
298% 1,319 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 60.6
191% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 1,107
DQ Write 688
DQ Mixed 902
671% 899 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 244%
Great: 332%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 34.4
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 23.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 101%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 50 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOD0A2
Typical MS-158P Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-158P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback