Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire M3985

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire M3985  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M3985
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120808
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 18 '23 at 14:09
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 150
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 258
34% 258 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Lighting 72.3
Reflection 75.7
Parallax 69.6
59% 72.5 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 68.7
57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 338
Write 377
Mixed 347
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 33
106% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 133%
Amicro AM8180 NVME 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 302 322 345 345 345 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 224
Write 292
Mixed 220
SusWrite 316
60% 263 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 19.7
64% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 89.6
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 132
93% 116 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 95%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 126
Write 112
Mixed 67.8
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 155
Write 153
Mixed 83.4
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
IT1167B USB Flash Disk 2GB
1GB free, PID 1167
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22
Write 5
Mixed 5.7
11% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG Kingston 9905471-015.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 57 72 27" 1280 773 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical Aspire M3985 Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3985

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback