Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 03:35
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 79.1
1-Core 152
2-Core 317
97% 183 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 886
85% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,324
82% 1,324 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 222
Reflection 211
Parallax 201
181% 211 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 154
Splatting 137
130% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MZ7KM960HAHP00D6 960GB
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GB32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 147 148 151 151 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.1% Very good
Read 421
Write 125
Mixed 131
SusWrite 148
45% 206 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 40.4
133% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 82.4
85% 141 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 32.7
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 28
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 100%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G3
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $976
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback