Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X670E CARBON WIFI (MS-7D70)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D70
MotherboardMSI MPG X670E CARBON WIFI (MS-7D70)  (all builds)
Memory17.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221128
Uptime24.5 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '24 at 17:13
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$252
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 75.5
1-Core 206
2-Core 396
117% 226 Pts
4-Core 766
8-Core 1,288
125% 1,027 Pts
64-Core 1,809
112% 1,809 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 109%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 40E3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 179
Parallax 168
152% 178 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 139
Splatting 120
119% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 133%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
779GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1880 137 191 177 131 206 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,751
Write 2,251
Mixed 1,895
SusWrite 454
357% 1,588 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 76.9
262% 93 MB/s
DQ Read 1,245
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 1137
852% 1,138 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 229%
Great: 365%
WDC WD40EZAX-00C8UB0 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 188 187 187 192 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 161
Write 152
Mixed 127
SusWrite 188
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 1.1
66% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 4.8
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 2.6
3% 5.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 39%
WDC WD40EZAX-00C8UB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 194 194 195 196 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 191
Write 198
Mixed 172
SusWrite 194
43% 189 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 1.3
73% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 2.8
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 5
4% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 39%
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1000GB
606GB free
Firmware: 52015100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 488 277 250 243 220 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 484
Mixed 444
SusWrite 326
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 47.4
165% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 3.7
94% 227 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 105%
Great: 111%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
878GB free
Firmware: VB421D70 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1513 1561 1556 1555 1554 1555 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,592
Write 1,546
Mixed 1,211
SusWrite 1,549
384% 1,725 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 48.6
182% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 674
DQ Write 955
DQ Mixed 862
638% 830 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 290%
Great: 310%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000Z36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
141% Outstanding
MC Read 52.7
MC Write 49.4
MC Mixed 48.9
144% 50.3 GB/s
SC Read 49.6
SC Write 55.6
SC Mixed 47
145% 50.7 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 141%
Great: 207%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 SPT0AD7 Sceptre F27
Typical MPG X670E CARBON WIFI (MS-7D70) Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X670E CARBON WIFI (MS-7D70)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $2,380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $371WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback