Asus P8H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H61  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '18 at 04:16
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 168
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 316
43% 317 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 20.9
19% 20.4 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 17.3
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
52netbar iShareDisk 4TB
566GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.3% Very poor
Read 73.6
Write 84.5
Mixed 72.8
17% 77 MB/s
4K Read 7.98
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 4.25
23% 7.56 MB/s
DQ Read 8.53
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 4.87
5% 8.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
52netbar iShareDisk 128GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5458-005.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.8% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.9
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 12.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61 Builds (Compare 399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61 - $77

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $213
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback