Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 84.4 2-Core 168 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 316 43% 317 Pts	64-Core 335 21% 335 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Lighting 23 Reflection 17.5 Parallax 20.9 19% 20.4 fps	MRender 24.6 Gravity 23.5 Splatting 17.3 17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
52netbar iShareDisk 4TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 566GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.3% Very poor	Read 73.6 Write 84.5 Mixed 72.8 17% 77 MB/s	4K Read 7.98 4K Write 10.5 4K Mixed 4.25 23% 7.56 MB/s	DQ Read 8.53 DQ Write 10.8 DQ Mixed 4.87 5% 8.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 15%
52netbar iShareDisk 128GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5458-005.A00LF 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.8% Average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 13.9 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 12.7 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	35x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	19x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	18x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	10x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,159 samples	7x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $213