Today's hottest deals

HP 870-244

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics87.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 870-244  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 830C
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 31 '24 at 07:16
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 180
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 440
48% 382 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.6% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 101
Parallax 105
89% 105 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 99.2
Splatting 90.8
85% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
800GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 33 26 13 50 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 108
Write 92.2
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 40.6
50% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 109%
Sandisk Extreme 55AE 1TB
901GB free
Firmware: 3008
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 17 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.82% Terrible
Read 13.9
Write 15.2
Mixed 22
SusWrite 16.2
13% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 8.82%
Great: 101%
Seagate OneTouch HDD 2TB
204GB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 37 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 38.2
Write 40.1
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 38.9
28% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.5% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 20.6
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 1R 3G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 11% 114 166 2 60 23" 1280 720 ACR057E SA230
Typical 870-244 Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: HP 870-244

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $597
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback