HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 60% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8704
Memory	4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221013
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '24 at 21:42
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180 44,448 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Memory 82.8 1-Core 134 2-Core 250 86% 156 Pts	4-Core 513 8-Core 852 83% 683 Pts	64-Core 1,279 79% 1,279 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$239 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% HP(103C 8789) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68.5% Good	Lighting 86.2 Reflection 82.8 Parallax 75.5 70% 81.5 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 71.7 Splatting 67.6 65% 81.5 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 258 200 170 170 169 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 532 Write 284 Mixed 500 SusWrite 202 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 18.7 67% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 170 150% 218 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 158%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 749GB free Firmware: MS2OA8L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 130 127 128 128 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 119 Write 131 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 127 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP32D4U8D8HC-16X 1x16GB 1,327 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	43.7% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 12.6 44% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 12.2 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 84.9 47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	65	52	144	27"	1280 720	GSM5B71 27GL650F

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 82%

Aircraft carrier

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-10700FIntel $180Bench 93%, 44,448 samples	1,047x
Core i7-10700Intel $229Bench 93%, 71,010 samples	1,025x
Core i5-10400Intel $130Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	854x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1,114x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	756x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	627x

SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 156%, 9,997 samples	1,344x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 167%, 8,409 samples	276x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 140%, 9,143 samples	235x

RAM
HP32D4U8D8HC-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 52%, 1,327 samples	737x
HP32D4U8S8HC-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 83%, 1,751 samples	368x
HP32D4U8S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 83%, 996 samples	185x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $470

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16