Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200826
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '24 at 17:07
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 632
62% 509 Pts
64-Core 828
51% 828 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600
ASRock(1849 5313) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.9% Above average
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 186
Parallax 293
0% 160 fps
MRender 233
Gravity 189
Splatting 213
173% 212 fps
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 200 123 122 130 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 320
Mixed 185
SusWrite 144
63% 286 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 44.7
154% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 241
200% 291 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
536GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 98 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 161
Write 153
Mixed 101
SusWrite 97.4
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 14.6
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 144 31.5" 1280 720 SAM707A LC27G5xT
Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback