Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83FQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 83FQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240409
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 15 '24 at 11:50
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-12450HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 68.9
1-Core 168
2-Core 336
99% 191 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 914
97% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,108
68% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A530M Graphics
Legend(17AA 3D16) ≥ 4GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 32.0.101.5972
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.9% Poor
Lighting 26.8
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 43.9
22% 37.1 fps
MRender 54.1
Gravity 41
Splatting 49.9
40% 48.3 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 63%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFINW512GZL 512GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C02C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 756
Write 709
Mixed 140
118% 535 MB/s
4K Read 61.9
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 53.7
191% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 428
DQ Write 77.1
DQ Mixed 107
116% 204 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 258%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 42.9
129% 45.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 42.6
SC Mixed 24.9
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 118%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 63: 0P 5R 9G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
63% 30% 83 166 1 144 15.5" 1536 864 AUO7EAD
Typical 83FQ Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 83FQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback