Today's hottest deals

MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics95.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory14.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210513
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateSep 15 '24 at 17:42
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$148
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 68.5
1-Core 132
2-Core 258
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 811
78% 643 Pts
64-Core 1,292
80% 1,292 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700
Sapphire(1DA2 E445) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 10GB, Driver: 24.6.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.4% Outstanding
Lighting 99.2
Reflection 109
Parallax 190
81% 133 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 109
Splatting 164
124% 150 fps
Poor: 103%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 387
Write 383
Mixed 276
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 38.4
132% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 178
186% 306 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$140
1TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1805 2118 2128 2143 2171 1889 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 1,691
Write 2,133
Mixed 2,004
SusWrite 2,042
446% 1,968 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 88
281% 96.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,272
DQ Write 927
DQ Mixed 1,107
825% 1,102 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 329%
Great: 587%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
79GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 442 458 443 442 394 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 429
Mixed 423
SusWrite 440
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 50.5
169% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 367
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.4% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 27
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 19.4
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1280 720 ACR079F QG271
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 6,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $274WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback