Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570S AERO G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 211%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 205%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive481% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570S AERO G  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240823
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 27 '24 at 19:42
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 98.8
1-Core 164
2-Core 328
107% 197 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 1,129
107% 885 Pts
64-Core 1,487
92% 1,487 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
Sapphire(1DA2 440E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.8.1
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
196% Outstanding
Lighting 245
Reflection 249
Parallax 533
199% 342 fps
MRender 409
Gravity 213
Splatting 333
260% 318 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 196%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$275
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4171 4196 4208 4256 4239 4257 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
481% Outstanding
Read 2049
Write 4,434
Mixed 3426
SusWrite 4,221
807% 3,532 MB/s
4K Read 79.7
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 102
329% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,016
DQ Write 713
DQ Mixed 903
664% 877 MB/s
Poor: 303%
This bench: 481%
Great: 616%
Team T2532TB 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP2818D8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 447 444 445 445 445 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 475
Write 445
Mixed 344
SusWrite 445
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 9.3
72% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 10.9
51% 114 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 106%
Team T2532TB 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: HP2818D8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 447 444 445 445 445 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 476
Write 446
Mixed 350
SusWrite 445
97% 429 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 9.3
110% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 10.7
50% 109 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84%
Great: 106%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
1.5TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3046 3051 3050 3046 3049 3049 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
429% Outstanding
Read 2,787
Write 3,120
Mixed 2,906
SusWrite 3,048
670% 2,965 MB/s
4K Read 70.1
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 89
287% 95.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,036
DQ Write 862
DQ Mixed 934
704% 944 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 429%
Great: 508%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 131 132 133 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 136
Write 122
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 132
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$100
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 138 135 139 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 104
Write 141
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 138
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
224% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate Game Drive Xbox 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 39 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 50.1
Write 37.7
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 37.9
29% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
215% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 57
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 46.1
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 35.1
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 44.8
102% 35.6 GB/s
Latency 47.8
84% 47.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 121%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 29 4 144 27.2" 2560 1369 GSM5B9A 27GN950
Typical GA-X570S AERO G Builds (Compare 688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570S AERO G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $904
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback