Today's hottest deals

Intel E5 M2L-8D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel E5 M2L-8D  (all builds)
Memory53.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '24 at 12:12
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 78.7
2-Core 158
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 693
58% 504 Pts
64-Core 2,213
137% 2,213 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 119
Parallax 138
109% 130 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 106
Splatting 91.8
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$70
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 183 96 85 83 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 436
Write 397
Mixed 43.4
SusWrite 142
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 26.1
84% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 183
164% 249 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 88%
Hyperx Fury 3D 480GB
200GB free
Firmware: S3701101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 109 93 99 101 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 323
Write 368
Mixed 134
SusWrite 127
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 16.9
87% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 67.4
94% 171 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 101%
Apacer AS2280Q4L 2TB
664GB free
Firmware: AP320PN0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1834 1868 1867 1863 1859 1505 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
232% Outstanding
Read 1,442
Write 2,021
Mixed 1,349
SusWrite 1,799
374% 1,653 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 46.7
156% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 466
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 409
293% 380 MB/s
Poor: 232%
This bench: 232%
Great: 281%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Dimm2_Manufacturer M393B2G70DB0- Dimm4_Manufacturer M393B2G70DB0- Dimm6_Manufacturer M393B2G70DB0- Dimm0_Manufacturer M393B2G70DB0- 64GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.6% Average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.4
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 61: 0P 5R 10G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 32% 47 164 2 60 24" 1280 720 SAM0B43 S24D300
History: Score 29: 0P 3R 1G 11B | Score 61: 0P 5R 10G 6B
Typical E5 M2L-8D Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Intel E5 M2L-8D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback