Average Bench: 78% (93rd of 715)

Based on 92,053 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 687F 56 Models: Radeon RX Vega, Radeon(TM) RX Vega

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

Good average bench

The AMD RX Vega-56 averaged 21.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD RX Vega-56 near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 98.3fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 114fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD RX Vega-56 is just 13.1%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD RX Vega-56 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 105fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 155fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 92,053 samples)
Min Avg Max
89.4 Lighting 98.3 109
98.1 Reflection 105 112
138 Parallax 155 175
80.1% 120 fps
Min Avg Max
82.7 MRender 88.6 94.1
103 Gravity 114 128
71.3 Splatting 74.5 77.6
74.1% 92.4 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Lighting 109
Reflection 110
Parallax 172
88% 130 fps
MRender 92.6
Gravity 131
Splatting 76
80% 99.8 fps
Asus(1043 0555) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Lighting 99.1
Reflection 108
Parallax 165
81% 124 fps
MRender 90.2
Gravity 122
Splatting 74.1
76% 95.3 fps
PowerColor(148C 2388) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.5.1
Lighting 97.4
Reflection 106
Parallax 149
79% 118 fps
MRender 89.2
Gravity 111
Splatting 75.4
74% 91.8 fps
XFX(1682 9C30) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.Q3.1
Lighting 94.4
Reflection 104
Parallax 156
77% 118 fps
MRender 87.7
Gravity 108
Splatting 74.7
72% 90.3 fps
CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Lighting 89.2
Reflection 102
Parallax 140
73% 111 fps
MRender 86.9
Gravity 105
Splatting 73.8
71% 88.7 fps
92,053 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,818,297 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 92,053 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (MSRP ≈ $400 @ launch in Aug '17)
Sapphire(1DA2 E376) 23% 79% ± 4%
Sapphire RX Vega 56 8GB Pulse
11276-02-40G
AmazonUS $45614 mins
MSI(1462 3681) 20% 76% ± 4%
MSI RX Vega 56 8GB Gaming Air Boost
RX Vega 56 Air Boost 8G OC
AmazonUS $17017 months
Asus(1043 0555) 19% 80% ± 4%
PowerColor(148C 2388) 9% 79% ± 4%
AMD(1002 0B36) 8% 75% ± 4%
Gigabyte(1458 230C) 8% 80% ± 3%
Gigabyte RX Vega 56 8GB OC
GV-RXVEGA56GAMING OC-8GD
ASRock(1849 1001) 6% 74% ± 5%
ASRock RX Vega 56 8GB Phantom Gaming X
90-GA0900-00UANF
AMD(1002 6B76) 3% 75% ± 5%
Sapphire RX Vega 56 8GB
21276-00-20G
AmazonUS $47914 mins
XFX RX Vega 56 8GB
RX-VEGMLBFX6
Gigabyte RX Vega 56 8GB
GV-RXVEGA56-8GD-B
Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) 2% 80% ± 2%
XFX(1682 9C30) 0% 74% ± 1%
Send price feedback
Typical RX Vega-56 Builds (Compare 7,384 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $570

Popular RX Vega-56 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 6 years ago.

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

3 months ago.

Comment 

running one monitor ill hop into a game and often as not ill play for a minute or 30 and the card will black screen on my ryzen rig and then i have to restart the entire pc to get it to work again so yeah mid game ill either get the black screen or the blue screen saying "thread stuck" maybe 50% of the time now when it actually works its not bad if it would actually work and this is on every game ive played from elder scrolls to wot its just ridiculous —Mar '21


Good

16 months ago.

Best value. Very balanced because of memory.


Excellent

19 months ago.

a great card for the money, it´s awesome with AMD new drivers!


Terrible

4 months ago.

j'ai une 780 TI et du coup quand je vois les caractéristiques de la bête bah ....


Excellent

17 months ago.

2 year old card, bougth for low price and still pretty nasty


Good

19 months ago.

Goes head to head with GTX1080 and RTX2060. Slightly surpasses them if undervolted and overclcoked. Almost forgot it costs at least 100€ less. Love it!


Excellent

2 months ago.

Very good at running half life alyx at ultra speeds


Good

11 months ago.

This card is use for heavy load.


Poor

16 months ago.

buy used for working every game


Good

7 months ago.

Got it for 249€ (half the original price) , works like a charm and packs a real punch (equivalent with Nvidia is 1070 ti)


Good

6 months ago.

It is trully a good graphics card. 100x better then the scam geforce gtx series


Excellent

3 years ago.

Good for its price. But not a very fast GPU anymore.


Excellent

17 months ago.

much cheaper than 1070 and better performance at everything other than CSGO


Average

23 months ago.

Now it's too slow. May be can be used at HD playing


Excellent

4 years ago.

in 2019 the price has got as low as 200 dollars and that makes it a great performance for the price.


Excellent

4 years ago.

Got it not too long ago for 1440p gaming, runs everything on ultra/very high with 16GB DRR3 and i5 4670k @4,6Ghz


Excellent

4 years ago.

Undervolt and get the best out of it!


Good

4 years ago.


Excellent

4 years ago.

i have this card and it still runs all the games just great! i would recommend the RX 5700 series for modern, more intensive gaming instead, as a late buy it's still good!


Excellent

5 years ago.

AMAZING value, good for a lot of purpose's


Good

13 months ago.

Nice card I have it for few months, it performs like a 1070ish may be a little bit better.


Average

2 years ago.

Got the asrock edition for cheap and it was quite okay for "rendering" gpu in my workstation pc, but it was damn too loud


Excellent

5 years ago.

I have a small company called powercolor. Regardless of what I throw at it the temps stay very very cool.


Good

5 years ago.

Currently a decent bang for your buck


Excellent

4 years ago.

Powerful GPU with excellent value.


Excellent

6 years ago.

Full disclosure, my Vega 64 is a Vega 56 running the Vega 64 BIOS. After flashing I feel as though I got a much better GPU than AMD intended. With the voltage bump on the HBM2 I can stay super stable at 1020mhz and with some substantial undervolting my Vega 56 performs above Vega 64 stock speeds and trades blows with the GTX 1080 in some games. The reference design is very robust overclocks nicely (albeit loudly). A desperately needed entry in AMDs line-up for those of us with Freesync monitors.


Good

5 years ago.

Great card for the price. Got it open box at micro Center for 330. Preforms well, I haven't flashed the 64 BIOS or undervolted it yet but I likely will in the future. This wasn't the game changer that many wanted it to be though.


Excellent

4 years ago.

took a bit of tweaking and troubleshooting to get it to fully OC and undervolt but when you find your cards sweet spot this thing is a monster at 1440p gaming on ultra settings. stays cool and quiet with custom fan curves a good card for those who love tweaking every setting possible on a gpu not a good card for people who just want to plug and play.


Excellent

4 years ago.

awesome card if you get a leveled die and custom cooler, otherwise don't bother.


Excellent

5 years ago.

Love this card, I have the Strix version and its rock solid at 1100mv 1652mhz with memory at 920mhz. My benchmarks place it right next to a 3rd party GTX1080. I upgraded from 2 RX580s in Crossfire.


Excellent

5 years ago.

This thing is a GD mule, it pulls it's weight at 2k and doesn't even cry.


Excellent

5 years ago.

A bit too loud, but otherwise a good card


Excellent

4 years ago.

Newegg's stuff should be on here, cause the $270 ASRock Vega 56 is amazing for the price.


Good

4 years ago.

Best bang-for-your-buck GPU at the time of writing (August, 2019). The RX 5700 and 5700 XT cards are good options as well, but the Vega 56 outdoes them in value-ratio by a bit, and it's good enough for my purposes. To compare those two more directly, the 5700 XT is 34% faster for 60% higher ($250- $400) cost: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-RX-Vega-56-vs-AMD-RX-5700-XT/3938vs4045 Nvidia has some good offering in the 2070 Super and such, but I prefer AMD because they work with all FreeSync monitors, which are substantially cheaper than the Nvidia GSync compatible ones. (Yes, I know Nvidia GPUs support a handful of FreeSync monitors now, but that list so far only includes some of the overpriced/fancier monitor models.)


Good

4 years ago.

Vega 64 Performance with less Power consumption After DV OC


Excellent

22 months ago.

It works with plenty of fps


Your
opinion?
715 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback