Average Bench: 82.4% (54th of 669)

Based on 93,778 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 687F 56 Models: Radeon RX Vega, Radeon(TM) RX Vega

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

Very good average bench

The AMD RX Vega-56 averaged just 17.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD RX Vega-56 near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 98.6fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 110fps

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD RX Vega-56 is 20.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD RX Vega-56 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 105fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 157fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 93,778 samples)
Min Avg Max
85.4 Lighting 98.6 113
86.3 Reflection 105 112
138 Parallax 157 180
79.7% 120 fps
Min Avg Max
81.5 MRender 88.5 93.9
98.5 Gravity 110 123
70.9 Splatting 74.7 77.7
85.6% 91 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 1660 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Lighting 116
Reflection 116
Parallax 179
94% 137 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 128
Splatting 78
99% 100 fps
Asus(1043 0555) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1662 MHz, MLim: 960 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Lighting 104
Reflection 112
Parallax 192
84% 136 fps
MRender 93.9
Gravity 127
Splatting 76.8
98% 99.4 fps
Asus(1043 0555) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Lighting 104
Reflection 108
Parallax 164
84% 126 fps
MRender 90.1
Gravity 117
Splatting 75.1
90% 93.9 fps
PowerColor(148C 2388) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Lighting 94.9
Reflection 104
Parallax 148
77% 116 fps
MRender 88.9
Gravity 105
Splatting 73.8
83% 89.3 fps
93,778 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 49,606,895 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 93,778 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (MSRP ≈ $400 @ launch in Aug '17)
Sapphire(1DA2 E376) 25% 83% ± 6%
Sapphire RX Vega 56 8GB Pulse
11276-02-40G
AmazonUS $43614 months
Asus(1043 0555) 18% 85% ± 4%
MSI(1462 3681) 18% 81% ± 6%
MSI RX Vega 56 8GB Gaming Air Boost
RX Vega 56 Air Boost 8G OC
AmazonUS $70011 months
Gigabyte(1458 230C) 9% 84% ± 7%
Gigabyte RX Vega 56 8GB OC
GV-RXVEGA56GAMING OC-8GD
ASRock(1849 1001) 9% 79% ± 5%
ASRock RX Vega 56 8GB Phantom Gaming X
90-GA0900-00UANF
PowerColor(148C 2388) 8% 84% ± 6%
AMD(1002 0B36) 7% 78% ± 6%
AMD(1002 6B76) 3% 79% ± 4%
Sapphire RX Vega 56 8GB
21276-00-20G
AmazonUS $59913 months
XFX RX Vega 56 8GB
RX-VEGMLBFX6
Gigabyte RX Vega 56 8GB
GV-RXVEGA56-8GD-B
Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) 2% 87% ± 4%
XFX(1682 9C30) 1% 77% ± 1%
Device(0000 0000) 0% 95% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 AC30) 0% 85% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2388) 0% 81% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical RX Vega-56 Builds (Compare 105,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,005

Popular RX Vega-56 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2022 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 4 years ago.

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

11 days ago.

Comment 

running one monitor ill hop into a game and often as not ill play for a minute or 30 and the card will black screen on my ryzen rig and then i have to restart the entire pc to get it to work again so yeah mid game ill either get the black screen or the blue screen saying "thread stuck" maybe 50% of the time now when it actually works its not bad if it would actually work and this is on every game ive played from elder scrolls to wot its just ridiculous —Mar '21


Good

4 months ago.

Best value. Very balanced because of memory.


Good

15 days ago.

j'ai une 780 TI et du coup quand je vois les caractéristiques de la bête bah ....


Good

3 months ago.

a great card for the money, it´s awesome with AMD new drivers!


Poor

10 months ago.

2 year old card, bougth for low price and still pretty nasty


Good

2 years ago.

good gpu for its price and is as just good as any 1070 gtx which has atleast $100 more in price


Good

16 months ago.

Goes head to head with GTX1080 and RTX2060. Slightly surpasses them if undervolted and overclcoked. Almost forgot it costs at least 100€ less. Love it!


Poor

5 months ago.

Very good at running half life alyx at ultra speeds


Good

5 months ago.

Quite loud, good performance though


Excellent

19 months ago.

buy used for working every game


Terrible

11 months ago.

Got it for 249€ (half the original price) , works like a charm and packs a real punch (equivalent with Nvidia is 1070 ti)


Excellent

13 months ago.

This card is use for heavy load.


Good

4 months ago.

Better then RTX 2060 for 30 euros more


Average

17 months ago.

It is trully a good graphics card. 100x better then the scam geforce gtx series


Excellent

13 months ago.

Good for its price. But not a very fast GPU anymore.


Excellent

4 months ago.

much cheaper than 1070 and better performance at everything other than CSGO


Excellent

9 months ago.

Has best value for its cost and its effectiveness is quite high (High End GPU).


Excellent

2 years ago.

in 2019 the price has got as low as 200 dollars and that makes it a great performance for the price.


Excellent

22 months ago.

Got it not too long ago for 1440p gaming, runs everything on ultra/very high with 16GB DRR3 and i5 4670k @4,6Ghz


Excellent

2 years ago.

Undervolt and get the best out of it!


Good

2 years ago.


Excellent

2 years ago.

i have this card and it still runs all the games just great! i would recommend the RX 5700 series for modern, more intensive gaming instead, as a late buy it's still good!


Average

18 months ago.

vega 56 ref good competiror for 1660 ti or 1070 at 2020 but hot


Excellent

2 years ago.

AMAZING value, good for a lot of purpose's


Excellent

2 years ago.

So much potential with a 64 BIOS


Good

6 months ago.

Good GTX 1070 alternative if you can find it for a good price, will suck up more power than a 1070 though.


Average

4 months ago.

Got the asrock edition for cheap and it was quite okay for "rendering" gpu in my workstation pc, but it was damn too loud


Excellent

2 years ago.

I have a small company called powercolor. Regardless of what I throw at it the temps stay very very cool.


Good

2 years ago.

Currently a decent bang for your buck


Excellent

2 years ago.

Powerful GPU with excellent value.


Excellent

4 years ago.

Full disclosure, my Vega 64 is a Vega 56 running the Vega 64 BIOS. After flashing I feel as though I got a much better GPU than AMD intended. With the voltage bump on the HBM2 I can stay super stable at 1020mhz and with some substantial undervolting my Vega 56 performs above Vega 64 stock speeds and trades blows with the GTX 1080 in some games. The reference design is very robust overclocks nicely (albeit loudly). A desperately needed entry in AMDs line-up for those of us with Freesync monitors.


Good

2 years ago.

Great card for the price. Got it open box at micro Center for 330. Preforms well, I haven't flashed the 64 BIOS or undervolted it yet but I likely will in the future. This wasn't the game changer that many wanted it to be though.


Excellent

2 years ago.

took a bit of tweaking and troubleshooting to get it to fully OC and undervolt but when you find your cards sweet spot this thing is a monster at 1440p gaming on ultra settings. stays cool and quiet with custom fan curves a good card for those who love tweaking every setting possible on a gpu not a good card for people who just want to plug and play.


Excellent

2 years ago.

awesome card if you get a leveled die and custom cooler, otherwise don't bother.


Excellent

3 years ago.

Love this card, I have the Strix version and its rock solid at 1100mv 1652mhz with memory at 920mhz. My benchmarks place it right next to a 3rd party GTX1080. I upgraded from 2 RX580s in Crossfire.


Excellent

2 years ago.

This thing is a GD mule, it pulls it's weight at 2k and doesn't even cry.


Excellent

2 years ago.

A bit too loud, but otherwise a good card


Excellent

2 years ago.

Newegg's stuff should be on here, cause the $270 ASRock Vega 56 is amazing for the price.


Good

2 years ago.

Best bang-for-your-buck GPU at the time of writing (August, 2019). The RX 5700 and 5700 XT cards are good options as well, but the Vega 56 outdoes them in value-ratio by a bit, and it's good enough for my purposes. To compare those two more directly, the 5700 XT is 34% faster for 60% higher ($250- $400) cost: https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-RX-Vega-56-vs-AMD-RX-5700-XT/3938vs4045 Nvidia has some good offering in the 2070 Super and such, but I prefer AMD because they work with all FreeSync monitors, which are substantially cheaper than the Nvidia GSync compatible ones. (Yes, I know Nvidia GPUs support a handful of FreeSync monitors now, but that list so far only includes some of the overpriced/fancier monitor models.)


Good

22 months ago.

Vega 64 Performance with less Power consumption After DV OC


Your
opinion?
669 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $289Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-12400F $184Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $254Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback