Fujitsu CELSIUS W520

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W520  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3167-A1
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '18 at 14:26
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 V2-$248
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 197
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 367
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro V4900-$150
AMD(1002 2B06) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
7.2% Terrible
Lighting 9.17
Reflection 9.04
Parallax 7.22
8% 8.47 fps
MRender 8.52
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 9.13
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.2%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000F0 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01F0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.5% Above average
Read 267
Write 253
Mixed 259
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 15.9
80% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 46.6
DQ Mixed 15
17% 28.8 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 98%
Transcend SSD370 128GB-$74
57GB free
Firmware: 20140516 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.3% Above average
Read 267
Write 162
Mixed 168
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 15.4
75% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 15.1
53% 116 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
125GB free
Firmware: FJK2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 88.4
Mixed 83.9
67% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.55
109% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 859B CT51264BA160B.C16F 859B CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.5% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W520 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W520

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $395
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback