Gigabyte GA-Z87-HD3

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87-HD3 (all builds)
Memory	19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130803
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '18 at 18:06
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Memory 89.9 1-Core 110 2-Core 218 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 414 8-Core 418 56% 416 Pts	64-Core 416 26% 416 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088 6,806 User benchmarks, average bench 47% EVGA(3842 2791) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Lighting 61.4 Reflection 59.9 Parallax 75.4 50% 65.6 fps	MRender 70.5 Gravity 61.7 Splatting 51.5 49% 61.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18414 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2930 (B1) Unknown 91 91 98 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 52 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 124 (EB) Unknown 99 99 674 (F1) Unknown 99 99 45340771718	47.7% Average	Read 257 Write 175 Mixed 182 45% 205 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 17.1 78% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 24.3 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 62.7 52% 71.7 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 68GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 21842 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3844 (B1) Unknown 93 93 66 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 49 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 24 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1253 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7273639813	52% Above average	Read 244 Write 248 Mixed 230 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 11.1 64% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 29.1 65% 134 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 85%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 15GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18775 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3313 (B1) Unknown 95 95 48 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 49 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 98 98 1828 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1327 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8859380330	52.6% Above average	Read 261 Write 247 Mixed 187 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 10.5 65% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 31.6 67% 136 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 85%
WDC WD50 00LPVX-22V0TT0 500GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 465GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 101 Write 104 Mixed 81.7 122% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.23 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 3x8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	48.3% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 14.8 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 14.8 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87-HD3 Builds (Compare 1,784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-HD3

CPU
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	463x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	356x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	290x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	170x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	154x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	102x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	67x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	48x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	51x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	42x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $157

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16