ADD TO PC
BUILD

Wisky 3G062i

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Wisky 3G062i (all builds)
Memory	0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1536 x 2048 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20141201
Uptime	56.3 Days
Run Date	May 06 '18 at 22:26
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z3735F 6,544 User benchmarks, average bench 34% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 64.8 1-Core 17.2 2-Core 32.5 29% 38.2 Pts	4-Core 57.4 8-Core 58.9 8% 58.2 Pts	64-Core 60.5 4% 60.5 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 0F31) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3910 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.7% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.78 1% 0.8 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.35 1% 1.15 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.7% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MAG2GA 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.3% Poor	Read 77.1 Write 15.1 Mixed 32.9 31% 41.7 MB/s	4K Read 7.87 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 1.79 554% 3.71 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 6.3 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 0.5 5% 1.9 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback