Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '18 at 20:26
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7740X-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 143
2-Core 275
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 789
80% 650 Pts
64-Core 793
49% 793 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 147
Parallax 137
103% 137 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 132
Splatting 109
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 100%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,373
Write 1,506
Mixed 1,335
384% 1,738 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 24.1
189% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 511
DQ Write 391
DQ Mixed 56.8
150% 320 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 261%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
11GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 426
Mixed 490
106% 475 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 24.5
137% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 63.9
82% 136 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 116%
Seagate ST3500841AS 500GB
163GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
31% Below average
Read 56.6
Write 51.1
Mixed 49.8
40% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.33
70% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31%
Great: 34%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
31GB free
Firmware: 04.04V06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 88.9
Write 91.9
Mixed 77.8
65% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 2.63
4K Mixed 0.72
167% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-4133 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.2% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 22.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $892
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback