Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	8.94% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 5140 168 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 51.2 1-Core 23.2 2-Core 46.7 28% 40.4 Pts	4-Core 88.8 8-Core 97.3 12% 93.1 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 147GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	8.94% Terrible	Read 68.9 Write 61.9 Mixed 59.8 14% 63.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 10.6 4K Mixed 0.5 8% 4.03 MB/s	DQ Read 3.69 DQ Write 7.63 DQ Mixed 2.88 3% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 8.94% Great: 105%
Scst_bio 1234567890sciaaa 215GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 199GB free Firmware: 220 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.7% Average	Read 106 Write 67.8 Mixed 84.2 65% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 0.48 4K Mixed 0.43 91% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 62%
Scst_bio 1234567890scibbb 215GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 199GB free Firmware: 220 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.8% Above average	Read 110 Write 74.6 Mixed 82.1 67% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 0.51 4K Mixed 0.32 80% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x1GB 1,329 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 8 of 8 slots used 8GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 4.5 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 122%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz1stBench 32%, 155 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54301stBench 45%, 279 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54201stBench 44%, 349 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GTS 250NvidiaBench 7%, 14,881 samples	3x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $72Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

Value: 16% - Very poor

Total price: $72