Asus P8P67 DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121031
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '18 at 02:07
Run Duration	668 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Memory 96.3 1-Core 115 2-Core 231 84% 147 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 400 58% 425 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$245 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6286) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.4% Average	Lighting 47.3 Reflection 54.6 Parallax 44.4 38% 48.8 fps	MRender 67.8 Gravity 47.2 Splatting 57.4 47% 57.5 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 124GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4929 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1615 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 61 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 86 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5996764767	102% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 401 Mixed 418 99% 443 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 68.3 4K Mixed 44.4 148% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 112 121% 203 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18965 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2111 (B1) Unknown 94 94 71 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 53 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 658 (F1) Unknown 99 99 36732005894	82.8% Excellent	Read 505 Write 342 Mixed 345 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 48.8 4K Mixed 23.2 111% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 70.5 87% 155 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 118%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$72 4,659 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 68GB free Firmware: 30.04G30 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 181 181 7916 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6149 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 16 16 61600 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2580 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 568 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6149 (C2) HDA temperature 117 96 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 373 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	37% Below average	Read 63.6 Write 64.8 Mixed 69 50% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.38 101% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 52%
SMI USB DISK 1GB 200 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	2.88% Terrible	Read 9.95 Write 1.51 Mixed 2.61 4% 4.69 MB/s	4K Read 4.44 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 18% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.88% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	65.1% Good	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 21.2 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 16.7 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 53.1 75% 53.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 DELUXE - $100

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	584x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	159x
Core i7-2600Intel $189Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	106x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	76x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	60x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	41x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	36x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	50x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	39x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $713

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16