Average Bench: 67.2% (25th of 548)

Based on 13,365 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 67B0 Model: AMD Radeon R9 200

Above average average bench

The AMD R9 290X averaged 32.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 199fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 173fps

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R9 290X is 21.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 290X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 152fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 123fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 13,365 samples)
Min Avg Max
129 Lighting 199 225
128 Reflection 152 166
185 Parallax 269 304
69.3% 206 fps
Min Avg Max
110 MRender 123 132
139 Gravity 173 187
150 Splatting 173 185
65.6% 156 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Asus(1043 0466) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.11.2
Lighting 201
Reflection 150
Parallax 259
69% 203 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 174
Splatting 171
65% 154 fps
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1305 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.11.2
Lighting 177
Reflection 158
Parallax 256
64% 197 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 157
Splatting 180
64% 155 fps
Asus(1043 0474) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.11.1
Lighting 177
Reflection 160
Parallax 218
59% 185 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 126
Splatting 166
56% 137 fps
13,365 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 5,874,104 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 13,365 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Sapphire(174B E285) 17% 68% ± 6%
Sapphire R9 290X 4GB TRI-X OC
11226-00-40G
AMD(1002 0B00) 15% 65% ± 12%
XFX(1682 9290) 10% 65% ± 11%
XFX R9 290X 4GB Double Dissipation
R9290XEDFD
MSI(1462 3080) 10% 66% ± 10%
Asus(1043 046C) 9% 69% ± 9%
Asus R9 290X 4GB DirectCU II
R9290X-DC2OC-4GD5
Gigabyte(1458 2281) 6% 68% ± 10%
Asus(1043 0466) 6% 64% ± 15%
Sapphire(174B E289) 5% 68% ± 3%
Asus(1043 046A) 4% 68% ± 2%
Sapphire(174B E282) 4% 68% ± 5%
Asus(1043 0474) 4% 67% ± 6%
MSI(1462 3070) 2% 71% ± 5%
PowerColor(148C 2342) 2% 69% ± 3%
PwrHis(1787 2342) 2% 70% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 227C) 1% 69% ± 2%
XFX(1682 9395) 1% 63% ± 9%
PwrHis(1787 2020) 1% 70% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 228D) 1% 68% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0472) 1% 69% ± 1%
MSI(1462 3072) 0% 70% ± 1%
MSI(1462 8038) 0% 68% ± 0%
MSI(1462 3071) 0% 68% ± 0%
MSI(1462 3084) 0% 68% ± 0%
PowerColor(148C 2347) 0% 67% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical R9 290X Builds (Compare 3,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,119

Popular R9 290X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

 Comments

Added 3 years ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

12 days ago.

AWESOME price-to-performance, I just got mine and I love it. Runs ultra settings on all games!

Comment 

I own less than 5 of these 290x. Assorted brands. They overheat (not a problem until they start cooking your sound card). The fans are so incredibly loud and make so little difference in temperature, you can not set your monitor to 1080p 120hz manually because of lack of driver support (I can do this with nvidia), you will get black screens after playing for hours under mysterious conditions (your entire screen goes black). Have a driver problem? Get ready to re-install windows, the software is so toxic you have to reformat the hard drive if it didn't work the first time. I am sure I could go on but thousands of dollars later I just don't care for them. Pros: great looking spec numbers that do not work in real life, Cheap by comparison to the real thing. If you would like to simulate the console experience on a PC I highly recommend AMD. Just remember to lower your settings.—Sep '14

Comment 

In terms of absolute minimum FPS and superior fundamental performance, the 290x is vastly superior to the 970 at everything except maximum burst framerate at 1080p, an absolutely useless performance metric commonly used by reviewers and nvidia to hide issues with relative smoothness. In terms of minimum FPS, the 290x is also very comparable to the 980, especially when you consider the superior crossfire implementation, yielding considerably better minimum FPS and scaling than 'SLI' will ever be capable of without a major hardware and complimentary software overhaul. SLI is broken. Crossfire is NOT. You can see nearly 100% scaling in a surprising number of titles. Add in a mantle/dx12 forward-looking arch, and clearly this iteration of GNC will continue in the spirit of GCN 1.0: fantastic compute performance that developers have only begun to utilize effectively. Just take note of how poorly the 680 compares to the 7950, let alone 7970.—Apr '15

Comment 

Flagship performance with a hefty aftermarket cooler for $300, and very overclockable. Unbeatable price:performance for single-card ultra settings solutions.—Apr '15

Comment 

Great GPU 290X 8GB X2 (crossfire) @ 1080 x 5670 Best GPU's ever. destroys everything! —Aug '15


Liked

2 months ago.

Comment 

I purchased a sapphire r9 290x tri-x oc, super low temperatures, low noise also on high load it handles all games maxed out at 60 FPS. I don't care about power consumption.—Nov '15


Excellent

25 days ago.

perfectttt


Excellent

1 month ago.

this is a beast


Excellent

14 days ago.

amazing card, can be found cheap


Excellent

3 months ago.

very very good for game


Good

5 months ago.

super card!


Excellent

1 month ago.

good gpu for dx12 and gaming


Terrible

1 month ago.

very high price


Below average

23 months ago.

Good card, but not worth the NOISE and HEAT it comes with


Very good

23 months ago.

Own the 290X crossfired, now liquid cooled with Aquacomputer Kyrographic Hawaii block... an execellent performer when heat and fan noise is dealt with. With the new AMD software, heat and noise can be reduced using Frame Rate Target Control (if you have a 60Hz monitor set FRTC to 60FPS)...far less heat and power consumption leading to less noise (mainly on reference cards even better on 3rd party cards) Please please please, get/save up and get a Freesync monitor...gosh I can't go back...much smoother game play even at 60Hz UBm claims it has terrible inconsistency but I would tie that to different overclock setting used. Check out my build https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/b/8dkTwP

Info  uk.pcpartpicker.com/...

Liquid Cooled Luxe


Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike

You have viewed 76 pages, please contribute.


548 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $288Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $250AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
Intel Core i5-7600K $180Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $160SanDisk Extreme 64GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $17
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $54Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $170SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback