Real World Speed
Performance profile from 91,301 user samples
80,457 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 55% Asus(1043 0501) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 55% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 38th / 586
10,844 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% Sapphire(174B E324)
Worst Bench: 60% Sapphire(174B E324)
Poor: 60% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 30th / 586
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
64.6 % 70.8 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+10%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
256 fps 277 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+8%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
140 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+7%
131 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
180 fps 182 fps +1%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps 183 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+45%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
299 fps 319 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+7%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
149 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+8%
138 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
204 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+6%
193 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
133 fps 192 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+44%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
158 fps 186 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+18%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91.4 fps 97.1 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+6%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
54.9 fps 67 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+22%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75.8 fps +4% 73.2 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93.3 fps 99.1 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
54.3 fps 58.5 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+8%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
191 fps 219 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+15%
Market Share
Based on 8,352,357 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.02 % Hugely higher market share.
+538%
0.16 %
Value
Value For Money
66.7 % Better value.
+20%
55.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
149 % Much more popular.
+67%
89 %
Price
Price (score)
$350 Much cheaper.
+34%
$529
Age
Newest
22 Months Much more recent.
+35%
34 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
216 fps 234 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+8%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
183 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+7%
171 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
185 fps 211 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+14%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
171 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+7%
160 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD R9 390X is a rebadged power hungry (350W+) 290X. The 390X has a slightly increased GPU clock speed, a significantly increased memory speed and a higher minimum VRAM of 8GB but it shares the same core GPU hardware. Looking at the overclocked performance differences between the older 290X and the 390X shows that the two cards are approximately the same, which comes as no surprise considering that the 390X is actually just a factory overclocked 290X. Smart shoppers obviously won't be happy to pay AMD a premium of around $100 simply for overclocking a two year old 290X. That said the 390X does offer stellar performance, particularly at 4K resolutions and if prices drop significantly it could become a strong contender. We only have one MSI sample benchmark for the 390X so far so we will revisit this GPU when we have a better sample of all the available cards. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $300Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $158
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $183SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $957SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback