Average Bench: 20.8% (107th of 555)

Based on 2,946 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 13BA Model: NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Very poor average bench

The Nvidia Quadro K2200 averaged 79.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 64.8fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 62.7fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro K2200 is just 3.23%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro K2200 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 42.2fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 36.9fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 2,946 samples)
Min Avg Max
58.1 Lighting 64.8 68.3
38.6 Reflection 42.2 43.4
54.3 Parallax 60.8 63.4
19.6% 55.9 fps
Min Avg Max
46 MRender 49.1 50.9
50.6 Gravity 62.7 69
34.8 Splatting 36.9 37.7
21.6% 49.6 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 361.91
Lighting 63.2
Reflection 41.3
Parallax 60.1
19% 54.9 fps
MRender 95.1
Gravity 104
Splatting 74.8
39% 91.2 fps
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 42.8
Parallax 67.7
21% 58.7 fps
MRender 50.6
Gravity 68.2
Splatting 37.4
23% 52.1 fps
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 43.2
Parallax 62.4
20% 57.7 fps
MRender 49.6
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 37.5
23% 51.9 fps
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 377.35
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 43
Parallax 61.5
20% 56.7 fps
MRender 51.2
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 37
23% 52.3 fps
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 372.95
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 42.5
Parallax 61.6
20% 56.2 fps
MRender 49.9
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 37.2
23% 51.7 fps
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 361.91
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 42.6
Parallax 60.2
20% 56.9 fps
MRender 49
Gravity 53.4
Splatting 37.3
20% 46.6 fps
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 369.9
Lighting 61.3
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 57.1
18% 52.8 fps
MRender 47
Gravity 49.9
Splatting 34.9
19% 43.9 fps
2,946 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 7,417,398 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 2,946 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $440 @ launch in Aug '14)
Nvidia(10DE 1097) 66% 21% ± 2%
HP(103C 1097) 34% 21% ± 1%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro K2200 Builds (Compare 1,225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $440

Popular Quadro K2200 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our calculated are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.

 Comments

Outstanding performance with a range of professional applications...

Added 3 years ago.

Your
opinion?
555 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $313Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $146
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $185SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $200SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback