Asus P9X79-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P9X79-E WS  (all builds)
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150508
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 20 '18 at 03:39
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0-$1,335
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 181
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 677
61% 513 Pts
64-Core 901
56% 901 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 120
Parallax 106
88% 111 fps
MRender 93.4
Gravity 101
Splatting 93.3
78% 95.9 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 420 420 410 433 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 480
Write 420
Mixed 343
SusWrite 361
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 34.6
116% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 209
177% 257 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90%
Great: 108%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 332 330 329 328 326 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,719
Write 1,971
Mixed 1,530
SusWrite 333
311% 1,388 MB/s
4K Read 69.9
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 59.9
217% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 232
178% 239 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 167%
Great: 215%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.9 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
5.85% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 3
Mixed 9
SusWrite 7.6
11% 9.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.85%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GXM F3-1600C9-8GXM F3-1600C9-8GXM F3-1600C9-8GXM BLS8G3D1609DS1S00 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00 64GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.1% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 28.4
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79-E WS Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus P9X79-E WS - $499

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,044
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback