Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	40.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory	376.5 GB free of 384 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180523
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '19 at 12:01
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: 34 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 81 1-Core 92.2 2-Core 184 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 523 54% 434 Pts	64-Core 915 57% 915 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Gigabyte(1458 2261) 3GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.5.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Lighting 53.2 Reflection 35.4 Parallax 70.9 43% 53.2 fps	MRender 33.1 Gravity 51.9 Splatting 44.1 36% 43.1 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 112 108 102 101 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 489 Write 403 Mixed 291 SusWrite 107 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 35 118% 42 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 311 244% 337 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 124%
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400 12,355 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 82GB free Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 180 176 176 182 184 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Read 380 Write 398 Mixed 261 SusWrite 175 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 87.3 4K Mixed 32.4 125% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 316 239% 322 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 106%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 107 109 110 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 145 Write 146 Mixed 67.6 SusWrite 108 85% 117 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 304% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 104%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 108 109 110 110 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	74% Very good	Read 149 Write 132 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 108 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 317% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 104%
Hitachi HDN726040AL 4TB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: W7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 163 166 170 166 167 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Read 122 Write 131 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 167 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 110%
Hitachi HDN726040AL 4TB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: W7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 148 156 150 150 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 134 Write 126 Mixed 53.9 SusWrite 151 84% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 110%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 109 107 109 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 105 Write 100 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 108 68% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 228% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 104%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2TB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 154 160 156 155 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 153 Mixed 67.6 SusWrite 157 98% 135 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 351% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3TB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 109 109 107 110 113 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Read 194 Write 146 Mixed 85.1 SusWrite 108 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 113%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 267GB free Firmware: CC51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 107 108 106 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 105 Write 77 Mixed 64.6 SusWrite 107 65% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF Samsung... 384GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.4% Good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 24.7 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 78.8 51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	5x
CPU:1stBench 70%, 34 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	7x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	4x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	7x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	3x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $249Bench 290%, 10,709 samples	3x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 2x16GBSamsungBench 52%, 85 samples	4x
M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Hyn... 384GBSamsungBench 83%, 6 samples	4x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $184

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16