Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	63.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory	376.2 GB free of 384 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180523
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '19 at 05:15
Run Duration	328 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: 34 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Memory 56.5 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 184 60% 111 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 536 52% 427 Pts	64-Core 918 57% 918 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 75%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Gigabyte(1458 2261) 3GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.2.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	41% Average	Lighting 53.3 Reflection 35.3 Parallax 66.5 43% 51.7 fps	MRender 33.2 Gravity 54.5 Splatting 44 36% 43.9 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 39%
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AC) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.91 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Lighting 78.9 Reflection 79.4 Parallax 68.5 64% 75.6 fps	MRender 73.3 Gravity 73.9 Splatting 76 61% 74.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 143 92 39 44 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Read 430 Write 280 Mixed 272 SusWrite 82.9 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 64.7 4K Mixed 35.2 118% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 321 240% 320 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 124%
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400 12,355 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 70GB free Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 143 148 167 171 165 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 378 Write 403 Mixed 260 SusWrite 155 67% 299 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 87.3 4K Mixed 33.5 130% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 314 239% 322 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 106%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$234 10,709 User benchmarks, average bench 290% 2TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1578 1623 1631 1567 1315 1197 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	224% Outstanding	Read 1,432 Write 1,490 Mixed 1,320 SusWrite 1,485 323% 1,432 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 97.9 4K Mixed 52 169% 61 MB/s	DQ Read 598 DQ Write 428 DQ Mixed 555 404% 527 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 224% Great: 371%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 101 105 107 105 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 172 Write 175 Mixed 68.8 SusWrite 103 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 407% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 104%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 101 105 107 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 146 Write 146 Mixed 64.6 SusWrite 104 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 284% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 104%
Hitachi HDN726040AL 4TB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: W7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 163 163 172 165 168 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 119 Write 134 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 167 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 110%
Hitachi HDN726040AL 4TB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: W7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 149 153 150 150 146 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Read 132 Write 130 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 150 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.4 154% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 110%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 325GB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 101 105 107 105 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 127 Write 131 Mixed 63.6 SusWrite 104 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 257% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 104%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1TB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 137 140 138 142 140 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Read 142 Write 139 Mixed 62.9 SusWrite 140 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 290% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3TB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 102 104 106 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 191 Write 144 Mixed 85.1 SusWrite 103 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 113%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 160 157 157 158 158 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	89% Excellent	Read 154 Write 121 Mixed 73.1 SusWrite 157 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Kingston 9965516-071.A00LF Samsung... 384GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	MC Read 37.6 MC Write 34.7 MC Mixed 34 101% 35.4 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	5x
CPU:1stBench 70%, 34 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	7x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	4x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	7x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	3x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $234Bench 290%, 10,709 samples	3x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 2x16GBSamsungBench 52%, 85 samples	4x
M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Hyn... 384GBSamsungBench 83%, 6 samples	4x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $184

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16