Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	64.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190508
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '19 at 18:28
Run Duration	253 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Memory 81.6 1-Core 114 2-Core 228 79% 141 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 908 80% 681 Pts	64-Core 2,404 149% 2,404 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3739) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Lighting 81.9 Reflection 78.7 Parallax 68.8 67% 76.5 fps	MRender 71.1 Gravity 74.5 Splatting 76.7 61% 74.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SH00R480GB 480GB 1,405 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 295GB free Firmware: S0110A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 440 411 6.5 67 6.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 504 Write 437 Mixed 9.8 SusWrite 228 65% 295 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 0.4 40% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 93%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1489 402 402 403 402 403 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	247% Outstanding	Read 2,491 Write 2,248 Mixed 1,559 SusWrite 583 384% 1,720 MB/s	4K Read 58 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 76 252% 86.5 MB/s	DQ Read 939 DQ Write 579 DQ Mixed 805 588% 774 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 247% Great: 302%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$86 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 509GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 103 104 104 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 105 Write 111 Mixed 61 SusWrite 102 70% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 88%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 168GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 140 140 142 146 144 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 101 Write 110 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 141 66% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 108%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$194 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 130 130 130 130 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	76.9% Very good	Read 138 Write 126 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 130 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 98%
EPSON Storage 64GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 59GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 7.3 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 11.8 Write 5.5 Mixed 10 SusWrite 7.6 11% 8.72 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 2.5 220% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 15%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 16TB 270 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 5.5TB free, PID 25f6 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 35 Write 4.7 Mixed 16.7 SusWrite 3.6 16% 15 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 146% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 136%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Team-Elite-2400 2x8GB 836 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 27.9 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 24.3 SC Write 32.7 SC Mixed 28.1 81% 28.4 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

CPU
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	85x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	44x
Ryzen TR 2920XAMDBench 81%, 3,902 samples	38x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	17x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	14x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	5x
F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 128%, 25 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 94%, 8,912 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,053

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16