Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140408
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '20 at 20:21
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 72.1 2-Core 132 59% 95.3 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 270 34% 261 Pts	64-Core 421 26% 421 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 3731) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 123 Reflection 125 Parallax 137 100% 128 fps	MRender 180 Gravity 121 Splatting 101 106% 134 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 256GB 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: JURA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 173 315 350 318 351 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	76% Very good	Read 426 Write 121 Mixed 387 SusWrite 291 68% 306 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 46 4K Mixed 30.2 97% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 271 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 241 181% 243 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 109%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 490GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 89 86 88 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 88.5 Write 44.3 Mixed 47.2 SusWrite 87.2 49% 66.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 451GB free Firmware: CC93 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 65 156 159 160 162 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 88 Write 13 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 119 43% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 31 Write 29.7 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 29 21% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 97%
Seagate BUP BL 5TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 451GB free, PID ab30 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 108 106 106 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 49.3 Write 75 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 107 105% 72.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.5 176% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 55%
Generic External 1TB 830 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 427GB free, PID 3920 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 93 93 93 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 114 Write 102 Mixed 29 SusWrite 92.5 109% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 63%
TOSHIBA External HDD 1TB 173 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 214GB free, PID 0b13 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 28 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 15.9 32% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 20%
Patriot Gauntlet Node 500GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 12GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 27.5 Mixed 25 SusWrite 15.9 32% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 1866EL Series 1600 CL10 Series 1866EL Series 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.6% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 14.7 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 11.8 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	863x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	209x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	110x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	83x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	62x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16